Rk Name gp ab r h 2b 3b hr rbi bb k sb cs avg obp slg
1 Barton 14 425 80 113 19 1 8 60 55 106 8 5 .266 .363 .372
2 Belmont Abbey 13 445 107 142 34 4 12 96 77 103 15 3 .319 .430 .494
3 Emmanuel (Ga.) 10 318 58 89 15 3 3 51 42 60 9 3 .280 .395 .374
4 Erskine 11 338 88 109 23 2 15 79 56 65 12 2 .322 .436 .536
5 King (TN) 10 292 57 83 14 10 4 46 32 73 17 8 .284 .368 .442
6 Limestone 12 352 50 81 16 2 9 43 40 102 3 3 .230 .329 .364
7 Mount Olive 8 288 70 77 19 4 9 66 51 64 11 3 .267 .384 .455
8 North Greenville 9 312 62 92 21 3 9 54 38 63 13 2 .295 .380 .468
9 Southern Wesleyan 13 437 114 148 31 - 15 103 60 93 9 5 .339 .429 .513
Rk Name gp hbp sf sh tb xbh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1 Barton 14 11 2 3 158 28 5 84 110 .76 496
2 Belmont Abbey 13 15 7 4 220 50 13 87 112 .78 548
3 Emmanuel (Ga.) 10 22 5 2 119 21 8 83 84 .99 389
4 Erskine 11 15 4 3 181 40 6 76 84 .90 416
5 King (TN) 10 11 7 2 129 28 3 53 80 .66 344
6 Limestone 12 14 4 3 128 27 5 72 91 .79 413
7 Mount Olive 8 6 4 2 131 32 5 92 49 1.88 351
8 North Greenville 9 10 8 5 146 33 7 69 92 .75 373
9 Southern Wesleyan 13 14 6 1 224 46 5 93 98 .95 518
Rk Name gp ip h r er bb k k/9 hr era
1 Barton 14 107.0 127 92 72 54 98 8.24 5 6.06
2 Belmont Abbey 13 112.0 112 60 54 64 103 8.28 3 4.34
3 Emmanuel (Ga.) 10 79.0 106 73 52 45 77 8.77 5 5.92
4 Erskine 11 85.0 72 55 41 53 108 11.44 8 4.34
5 King (TN) 10 77.1 59 36 26 33 94 10.94 2 3.03
6 Limestone 12 96.0 111 70 53 54 79 7.41 7 4.97
7 Mount Olive 8 70.0 59 54 37 48 88 11.31 8 4.76
8 North Greenville 9 78.0 80 34 30 19 80 9.23 1 3.46
9 Southern Wesleyan 13 104.0 138 86 65 42 93 8.05 10 5.63
Rk Name gp tc po a e fpct dp sba rcs rcs% pb ci
1 Barton 14 468 321 125 22 .953 4 23 6 .207 8 -
2 Belmont Abbey 13 484 336 139 9 .981 9 7 8 .533 6 -
2 Emmanuel (Ga.) 10 347 237 80 30 .914 1 13 3 .188 5 -
2 Erskine 11 345 255 72 18 .948 8 25 2 .074 5 -
2 King (TN) 10 323 232 81 10 .969 4 10 1 .091 3 -
2 Limestone 12 424 288 116 20 .953 8 26 - - 2 -
2 Mount Olive 8 286 210 61 15 .948 4 10 1 .091 2 -
2 North Greenville 9 329 234 83 12 .964 4 9 1 .100 - -
2 Southern Wesleyan 13 455 312 116 27 .941 10 11 4 .267 5 2
Rk Name gp ab r h 2b 3b hr rbi bb k sb cs avg obp slg
1 Barton - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2 Belmont Abbey 3 105 36 39 10 1 3 32 20 15 5 2 .371 .485 .571
3 Emmanuel (Ga.) 3 99 13 24 5 1 - 12 13 23 3 1 .242 .345 .313
4 Erskine - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 King (TN) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 Limestone - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 Mount Olive - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 North Greenville - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 Southern Wesleyan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rk Name gp hbp sf sh tb xbh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1 Barton - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
2 Belmont Abbey 3 4 1 2 60 14 - 26 22 1.18 132
3 Emmanuel (Ga.) 3 3 1 - 31 6 1 22 28 .79 116
4 Erskine - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
5 King (TN) - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
5 Limestone - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
5 Mount Olive - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
5 North Greenville - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
5 Southern Wesleyan - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
Rk Name gp ip h r er bb k k/9 hr era
1 Barton - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00
2 Belmont Abbey 3 25.0 24 13 10 13 23 8.28 - 3.60
3 Emmanuel (Ga.) 3 22.0 39 36 28 20 15 6.14 3 11.45
4 Erskine - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00
5 King (TN) - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00
5 Limestone - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00
5 Mount Olive - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00
5 North Greenville - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00
5 Southern Wesleyan - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00
Rk Name gp tc po a e fpct dp sba rcs rcs% pb ci
1 Barton - 0 - - - - - - - - - -
2 Belmont Abbey 3 104 75 26 3 .971 1 3 1 .250 - -
2 Emmanuel (Ga.) 3 101 66 27 8 .921 - 5 2 .286 1 -
2 Erskine - 0 - - - - - - - - - -
2 King (TN) - 0 - - - - - - - - - -
2 Limestone - 0 - - - - - - - - - -
2 Mount Olive - 0 - - - - - - - - - -
2 North Greenville - 0 - - - - - - - - - -
2 Southern Wesleyan - 0 - - - - - - - - - -